In the past couple of years, I’ve
written about the cost to lenders when there are technical errors in their
recorded security documents, such as mortgages, and how they chose to correct
those errors. See “Mortgage
Execution in Ohio: the Twilight Zone where a person can both ‘know’ and ‘not
know’ the same information” and “Lenders
Beware: Mortgage Errors Can Really Cost You.”
Bankruptcy trustees have filed numerous adversarial proceedings
in Ohio seeking to remove a secured lender’s preference on mortgaged real
property by asking the court to void mortgage on a technical defect in the
acknowledgement clause. Courts have frequently sided with the bankruptcy trustees
in these cases, holding that the defective acknowledgement in the mortgage due
to its failure to strictly follow the requirements in RC §5301.01 renders the mortgage
not entitled to be recorded (even though it was) and therefore it did not provide
constructive notice (even though the trustee had actual notice). Recent
legislation might just change the outcome of many of these cases.
The Legacy Trust Act (the “Act”) became effective March 27,
2013. Sub H.B. 479, which included the Act, also included modifications to
other statutes to complement the Act. RC §317.08 [Records to be kept by
county recorder.] provides for the various types of records to be kept by the county
records, which includes, among others, deeds, mortgages, leases, land
installment contracts, affidavits and the like, and was amended by the Act to
add a new category for transfers, conveyances or assignments of any type of “tangible
or intangible personal property…”. The Act also amended RC §1301, the general
provisions affecting commercial transactions to added a new section, RC §1301.401 [Effect of recording
documents.]
RC §1301.401
provides that any document referenced in RC §317.08 and any document, the
filing of which is required or allowed under Chapter 1309 [Secured
Transactions], is a “public record.” This section also states that “[a]ny
person contesting the validity or effectiveness of any transaction referred to
in a public record is considered to have discovered that public record and any
transaction referred to in the record as of the time that record was first
filed with the secretary of state or tendered to a county recorder for
recording.” (emphasis added)
It’s not unreasonable to argue that, based on the language
in RC §1301.401, a bankruptcy
trustee should be deemed to have had constructive notice of the mortgage at the
time it was tendered to the recorder for recording. Until a court in Ohio addresses the interplay
between RC §1301.401 and RC §5301.01, we won’t know which
provision will come out on top. However, look for lenders’ counsel to start
using this new provision in the Act to buttress their arguments against voiding
the lenders’ mortgages.
________________
1 comment :
Thanks for shairing. I’ve copied it into the story above, to give it more attention.
Post a Comment